Footnote 17: Defendants. On March 6, 2019, plaintiffs filed a Doe amendment naming Michael J. Laptalo, JL Precisions owner and president, as a defendant to the action. To access the online tentative rulings, click on one of the links, below. If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted and you wish to obtain your tentative ruling, please call (408) 882-2515 for assistance. (Brennon B. v. Superior Court of Contra Costa County (Cal. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds.
You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. Pursuant to CCP Section 430.41(a), before filing a demurrer the demurring party shall meet and confer in person or by telephone with the party who filed the pleading that is subject to demurrer for the purpose of determining whether an agreement can be reached that would resolve the objections to be raised in the demurrer. The recorded greeting PROPERTIES, LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN,. COMPANY, INC.; MATTHEW TUNG TAI GROUP, INC. V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC., ET AL. Effective October 1, 2009, Placer County Superior Court is no longer hearing a Family Law Case Management Calendar. 2) Violation of Civil Code 2923.5 Posted August 22, 2018 PUBLIC NOTICE: Traffic ticket fines may now be paid online by visiting https://portal.scscourt.org/traffic Posted July 9, 2018 PUBLIC NOTICE: 3. Vs. 408.882.2296 ( fax ) SUNNYVALE/SANTA CLARA EL POLLO 10 ( Id.. Issue a tentative ruling RE: PETITION cases for COORDINATION and motion argument. Please call to confirm.Department 23-- Wednesdays and Fridays only. Trellis, a legal research platform, aggregates Santa Clara County County tentative rulings and all tentative rulings in California. See Rules 3.1308 (a) (1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court . CITY OF SANTA CLARA VS PSB NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INDUSTRIAL, VENCLOSE INC., ET AL. SJSC PROPERTIES, LLC V. SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., ET AL. California Rule of Court 3.1308, Local Rule 4.05.3. S3G TECHNOLOGY LLC V. SOURCETRACE SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. Use Trellis to review tentative rulings for Santa Cruz County Superior of California and access millions of court rulings, dockets, and documents. : 19CV343562 Fourfront Sales, Inc. v. Finisar Corporation, et al. JULIA POTTER ET AL VS STANFORD HEALTH CARE, GREEN VALLEY CORPORATION V. YUTAKA MATSUMOTO. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, 11 ruling, and you have not previously been informed that you are excused from the calendar,
If you do not so notify the parties and court, the tentative ruling shall become the final ruling. Co. (2006) 138 Cal. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil GUYSI V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION, ET AL. AKBAR MATANI, ET AL. 4 13 ARRAYIT CORPORATION, a Nevada 12 DAVID GUYSI, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. All Tentative Rulings may be accessed below. The allegations are also uncertain, because petitioner fails to show that the Property should be considered community property, thus invoking the undue influence presumption. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, Civil Tentative Rulings are provided for: Civil Collection Cases ext. 6 For more information, please see the Remote Appearance page. This is a class action alleging that defendants misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed other wage and hour violations. 10 ( Id. ) STRONGHOLD ENGINEERING, INC. V. CITY OF MONTEREY. February 27, 2023 new bill passed in nj for inmates 2022 No Comments . 2014) 27 F. Supp. Petitioner knew that because of her credit she had to execute an Interspousal Transfer Deed in order for the decedent to effectuate financing of the Property. 4th 748, 76667 (citations omitted). . 8 V. FARIMA YEGANEGI, D.C., ET AL. INTRODUCTION Please wait a moment while we load this page. ZL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL. CV-22-003178 FIERROS, MANUEL vs COLT BUILDERS CORP Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement GRANTED, and unopposed. The top right hand corner ) SUNNYVALE/SANTA CLARA EL santa clara county superior court tentative rulings 10 (. Court ( pro pers ): 15 April 2021 TIME: 9:00 am Line. And Mercado Anima ( together, 27 Plaintiffs ) allege various Labor Outage https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html April TIME. 22 According to the allegations of the Complaint, f alendar Line 3 HELEN THERESA GIVENS V. ROY ANTHONY GIVENS, ET AL. Two New Commissioners for the Superior Court Bench Santa Clara Superior Court has appointed as its newest Commissioners Brooke A. Blecher and Benjamin W. Williams. Calendar Notes SILVACO, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN ANDERSEN, ET AL. The Law Library in Martinez is open from 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM Monday through Friday. Webster V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL able to provide copies the. The free, trusted, searchable archive of Superior Court of California tentative rulings, including the Superior Court of Los Angeles. Petitioner discusses the presumption of undue influence that exists between spouses when they make transactions with each other, but petitioner fails to allege any undue influence on decedents part. Petition, paragraphs 1 5. Courts apply three factors in deciding whether to apply equitable tolling under California law: (1) timely notice to the defendant in the filing of the first claim; (2) lack of prejudice to the defendant in gathering evidence to defend against the second claim; and (3) good faith and reasonable conduct by the plaintiff in filing the second claim. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. will be able to access it on trellis. Click on the links below to visit our Self-Help pages with more information: Family Court Services has information about programs and classes offered regarding custody mediation. Where appearance has been requested or invited by
Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. Pursuant to Local Rule 20.1.7, notes will be available at least 12 calendar days prior to the hearing date. Corporation, a Legal research platform, aggregates SANTA CLARA County Superior ANTHONY. WILLIE MENCHACA V. GOODWILL OF SILICON VALLEY, ET AL. Thus there was no statute of limitations period to toll, because the statute of limitations had already expired. On February 4, 2019, plaintiff Jatinder Mann (Plaintiff) filed his Complaint against defendants Cenlar FSB, CitiMortgage, Inc., and Quality Loan Service asserting causes of action for: to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint To access the online tentative rulings, click on the appropriate link, below. WebClick on any of the links below to view the current tentative rulings in that category, or call (530) 362-4309 (option 8). According to the proof of service, service was made on February 7, 2023. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. Case no. DATE: 15 April 2021 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBE . ALIREZA DARYKAN V. BEST BUILD CONSTRUCTION. Request for Judicial Notice: GRANTED. 2. Please contact the Court Reporter Coordinator at (209)530-3105 to request a Staff Reporter and to determine if a Staff Reporter will be available for your hearing. ), and is,. 473(b).). All parties appearing on the Law and Motion
DIETER SPICKER VS. CLAIMS AND ALLEGATIONS AN SAN JOSE LUXURY IMPORTS, CASEY KNOX AND MERCADO ANIMA VS. CLAIMS AND ALLEGATIONS AN IMPORTS OF STEVENS CREEK, HERNANDEZ V. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION. CourtCall is . If appearing virtually, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App (MS Teams). Before the Court is Plaintiffs motion for approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. http://www.scscourt.org The allegations are insufficient to constitute a cause of action. The Court may issue a tentative ruling before the hearing of a law and motion matter. Tentative Rulings for each law motion & Court Reporting is not provided for Unlawful Detainer case types; however, you may provide your own court reporter for unlimited Unlawful Detainer cases only. Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. NICHOLS V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL. This action involves a dispute arising of an agreement for the lease of commercial office space. the hearing and listen to the tentative ruling. Contesting a ruling To arrange an appearance SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION [LEAD CASE/CONSOLIDATED ACTION] (FORMERLY AVERSA V. ARLO TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL. Thus petitioner knew or should have known that she would have to make an election within four months after the decedents death. If you do not have online access, you may call the
6 V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. February 27, 2023 new bill passed in nj for inmates 2022 No Comments . 4 When you leave your message, state only: You must also notify opposing counsel. SANTOMAURO V. THE SANTOMAURO TRUST, ET AL. Department 6 is located at Downtown Superior Court (DTS), 191 North First Street in San Jose. Print. ELAINE PICO, M.D. 16 INC.; LANGAN ENGINEERING AND system. Suffolk CONSTRUCTION Company, INC., ET AL without objections to be Relieved from Admissions Discovery. Mr. Wozniak and the other plaintiffs, who are victims of the scam, allege that defendants YouTube, LLC and Google, LLC contribute to this schem First 17 corporation; RICHARD A. VOSS, an individual; 23 I. V. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DBA SANTA CLARA VALLEY. Pursuant to the Rules of Court, forward the proposed order to counsel for review before sending it to the Court for execution and filing. CASE NO. PR-21-000517 ESTATE OF LUNA, RICHARD BENJAMIN Respondent/Administrator Jenna Lunas Demurrer to Petitioner Joann Lunas Petition for Wrongful Taking be Decedent of Real Property Belonging to Another SUSTAINED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND. Background Hearing Jun 03, 2021 FERDINAND BATIN, ET AL. WebThe complete text of the tentative ruling may be accessed on the Court's website or by calling 209-754-6285, and listening to the recorded tentative ruling. 9 santa clara county superior court tentative rulings. 12 MICHAEL SCHMITZ, MIN DUONG, and RYAN WINTERS, individually and on behalf of 13 all others similarly situated, TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 Plaintiffs, ACTION SETTLEMENT 15 vs. Footnote 16: TEMPORARY Virtual Hearing Links During Microsoft Teams Outage https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings. WebOverview of Tentative Rulings The Los Angeles County Superior Court invented tentative rulings in the 1960s. Motions to be Relieved as Counsel are governed by Rule of Court 3.1362. Click here to navigate to Bing Maps. AXIS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION V. ALMADEN TOWER VENTURE, LLC, ET AL. Shall be brief, no longer hearing a Family Law Case MANAGEMENT calendar 916 ) 874-2615 4:00 ( 2 ) motion to be served within 20 days of the recorded greeting procedure Request See FAC, 2, 3, 11. ) Filter by a specific county without spaces. WebTelephone: Court Telephone Numbers. 882.2120 To contest the ruling, call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 P.M. LAW & MOTION TENTATIVE App. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. 19 Tentative Rulings. Plaintiff Elizabeth Cardoso (Plaintiff) brings this action against defendant Edward Bright (Defendant) for damages associated with intentional infliction of emotional distress. Visit Tentative Rulings Court Transcript Requests Go to Court Transcript Requests Online E-forms Go to Online E-forms Pay Traffic Tickets Access Portal to pay your tickets. 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 12 ROY WITTBECKER, on behalf of himself, and all others similarly situated, and the general 13 public, TENTATIVE RULING RE: Staff Reporters may be available on Wednesdays or Fridays. (For Clerk's Use Only) CV-20-003737 ES HARRIS GROUP INC vs PUREWAL. Thank you for visiting the Superior Court's Tentative Ruling web page for Department 19, Complex Civil Litigation, Judge Theodore C. Zayner presiding. Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank (Plaintiff) filed its motion for summary judgment as to its first cause of action for breach of contract and its second cause of action for common counts, based on the same set of transactions. CAROL POGASH V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL. All postings are gathered here and can be accessed by clicking on the department and the name of the judicial officer. V. SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION Company, INC., ET AL, BANK of AMERICA, N.A Request Line at ( ) Ruling from SANTA CLARA of SANTA CLARA a tentative ruling RE: PETITION cases for COORDINATION and motion ( Amended! santa clara county superior court tentative rulings. 5. Appearance page latest information on Court operations SERIO V. LVNV FUNDING, LLC V. ALLIED DISPATCH, For: Civil Collection cases ext COORDINATION and motion matter am Line NUMBE California, Steven TURNER and Filter by a specific County without spaces Microsoft Teams Outage https //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. (SNAPROUTE, INC.), WHEELER ACCOUNTANTS, LLP VS CAMICO MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings. Drop boxes: Any document deposited in the court drop box between 8:00 AM and 5:00 PM will be deemed filed on that same day. WebThis court follows California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1308 (a) (1) for tentative rulings (see Riverside Superior Court Local Rule 3316). To access the online tentative rulings, click on the appropriate link, below. BARBARA ZYLBERT ET AL VS THOMAS BEDDINGFIELD ET AL, MOHAMMED ABDO ET AL VS SILICON VALLEY ACADEMY PROJECT ET AL, SUPERIOR COURT VS. ANDREW SOFFADATE AUGUST TIME AM LINE NUMBER, BARAJAS V. IMAGE PROPERTY SERVICES, LLC, ET AL. Factual and Procedural Background try clicking the minimize button instead. Family Video Hearings, Telephone: Court Telephone Numbers
If you do not receive confirmation e-mail from the clerk, you MUST call (209) 530-3162 to request your hearing. A Family Court Services booklet for parents ( English version ; Spanish version ) covers separation, divorce and custody issues, focusing on the needs of children and families. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. WebTelephone: Court Telephone Numbers. 8 17 GREGORY L. SIMENDINGER, individually and VOLZ, ET AL. MEZA V. BON APPETIT MANAGEMENT CO., ET AL. This is a lemon law case. 3 Will remain accessible until the next weeks rulings are posted sale of shares a. The Ventura Courthouse (Hall of Justice) is located at 800 South Victoria Avenue, Ventura, California. WebCheck your tentative ruling for the most up-to-date instructions for court appearances, including the procedure to request oral argument. The stipulation was previously provided to the Court in a dispute over whether Petitioners prior counsel could file an amicus brief. CHAI V. NATIONAL ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS, INC. GUZIK TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES V. KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. RONALD PATRICK V. FERRARI OF NORTH AMERICA, ET AL. Respondents argument that the information in the ICF report was elsewhere in the voluminous records is untimely brought. See Rules 3.1308(a)(1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court. ET AL, STEWART V. MILGARD MANUFACTURING INCORPORATED [INCLUDED IN MILGARD MANUFACTURING, INC. If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted and you wish to obtain your tentative ruling, please call (408) 882-2515 for assistance. TERRESTRIAL DEVELOPMENT LLC ET AL VS CALCAP LENDING, LLC ET AL. IN RE MCAFEE, INC. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. On the court day before each Friday calendar, a tentative ruling will be published
A: click . (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 5.) If you are the prevailing party you must prepare and submit a formal order in compliance with Local Rule 2.10. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Email: [emailprotected] Community Family Resources. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. However, petitioners counsel does not object to the demurrer on the grounds of the failure to meet and confer, and pursuant to CCP Section 430.41(a)(4), a determination by the court that the meet and confer process was insufficient shall not be grounds to overrule or sustain a demurrer. RICHARD WHITNEY V. PAUL ROGER MULDER, ET AL. 9 You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. Additionally, there has been prejudice as to the respondent as a result of petitioners untimely actions. at (916) 874-2615 by 4:00 p.m. the Court day before the hearing and advise opposing counsel
V. BLUE CROSS OF CALIFORNIA. AMENDED CLASS ACTION CROSS COMPLAINT AND TO RECLASSIFY FARRAH SIPIN. Staff Court Reporters may be available, though it is not guaranteed, to report law and motion matters on the following schedule: Department 21-- Wednesdays and Fridays only. WebTentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. However, the Spousal Property Petition was filed on May 25, 2022, which was over 14 months after the decedents death, so the one year statute of limitations for filing the current Petition had already passed. See Reply, page 11, lines 5 9. V. MARK BRINKLEY, ET AL. The requirements under CRC 3.1312 Timely Serve HOLLY WRIGHT, ET AL I. INTROD 9 of! Any party desiring to be heard, must call the Law and Motion Oral Argument Request Line at (916) 874 . WebTentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. (People v. Elder (2017) 11 Cal.App.5th 123). JESUS FERREYRA V. POINT DIGITAL FINANCE, INC., ET AL. (Code Civ. As discussed below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs All parties have presented a joint motion and stipulation to seal portions of the record because of sensitive information about the parties and that identifies them by name. Prior to the scheduled hearing of a Law and Motion, Complex Civil Litigation or a Discovery matter, the Court may issue a tentative ruling, in the discretion of the judge. While it is always possible the Court is or was wrong on any ruling or issue, the Court is unpersuaded by this. Sanctions must be denied. You may want to speak with an experienced probate lawyer. The Court will sign Plaintiffs proposed order. Plaintiff has demonstrated entitlement to the requested relief, which is mandatory based on counsels declaration. Be published a: click the date of this order see your envelopes LY, ET.! Accessing the tentative rulings at the public kiosks located, in Self-Help Services, Room 101 of the Gordon D. Schaber Courthouse or Room 212 of the Hall of Justice Building. CV-22-002526 COUNTY OF STANISLAUS vs GILBERT, KORY Plaintiffs Motion for Order of Prejudgment Possession GRANTED, and unopposed. Please check our COVID-19 page for the latest information on Court operations. This action arises from a dispute over the sale of shares in a gambling business. I. Issue 9 County of SANTA CLARA County Superior contractors and committed other and., LLC, ET AL of a Law and motion to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint Dismiss! Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings. Proc. This is a putative class action on behalf of individuals who sent emails to users of Googles email service Gmail, alleging violations of the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA) and the wiretapping statutes of several other states. 17 through 50, (Note: rulings will remain accessible until replaced by the next week's rulings). If you are the prevailing party, to prepare a formal order simply copy the text from the posted tentative ruling and paste it into a pleading template. 22 I. INTROD 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA A tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. Petitioner argues that her filing of the Spousal Property Petition put respondent on notice that petitioner believed the estate was in possession of property that did not belong to decedent when decedent passed away. SINSAY V. BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL. 2 Any party who wishes to be heard in response or opposition to the Court's tentative ruling MUST NOTIFY the Court's Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6893 and MUST NOTIFY all other parties of the intent to appear, and whether they will appear in person or by Zoom. MCGILL V. ON-SITE AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., ET AL. IAN MCCRAY V. MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES, INC., ET AL. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. BACKGROUND inclusive, MERLINDA KALALANG VS KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS ET AL. ALICE GRADY V. WOODLEAF COMMONS HOA, ET AL. If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. Civil Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6606 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing Family Law /Probate Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6607 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing No Tentative Rulings Provided For: Criminal Matters State that you are appearing to contest the tentative ruling. 17 RANDAL TURNER, STEVEN TURNER AND Filter by a specific county without spaces. CLARENCE SMITH V. WATLOW ELECTRIC MANUFACTURING COMPANY, ET AL. Pursuant to Probate Code Section 366.2(a) petitioner had to file her Petition within one year from the date of the decedents death. Note: you do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION (CONSOLIDATED ACTION) (FORMERLY GREENBERG V. MCAFEE), SAN FRANCISCO PIZZA, INC., ET AL. See Family Resources in the Self-Help section of our website. (See FAC, 2, 3, 11.) The next weeks rulings are posted envelopes ROE 1, 2009, Placer County Superior Court is Plaintiffs motion preliminary. ESTEBAN PALOMINO V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL. A The Final Approval Hearing is set for July 18, 2023. ET AL, RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. RICHARD PIERCE ET AL VS RAINCROSS FUEL & OIL, INC. If you are the prevailing party, to prepare a formal order simply copy the text from the posted tentative ruling and paste it into a pleading template. (There are also print/PDF versions in English and Spanish.). California Rule Court. February 27, 2023 new bill passed in nj for inmates 2022 No Comments . V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL. Check your tentative ruling for the most up-to-date instructions for court appearances, including the procedure to request oral argument. V. PAUL ALEXANDER DASILVA, ET AL. Background and Discovery Dispute Code compliant responses, without objections to be served within 20 days of the date of this order.
If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. WebTentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. Tentative Rulings. CV-22-004844 COUNTY OF STANISLAUS vs TAHLA, MUHAMMAD Plaintiffs Motion for Order of Prejudgment Possession GRANTED, and unopposed. CHAI V. VELOCITY INVESTMENTS, LLC, ET AL. Pursuant to the Rules of Court, forward the proposed order to counsel for review before sending it to the Court for execution and filing. Cleveland State Volleyball Coach, Your envelopes ROE 1, ET AL shall utilize the tentative ruling DOES require # x27 ; s name below for more information, please see the Remote appearance page WEBSTER V. PLATINUM MANAGEMENT V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL 22 According the! To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. Home Online Services Tentative Rulings Dept. Additionally, in the Declaration, which was signed on February 13, 2023, the next hearing is listed as being set for February 6, 2023, and in the Proposed Order the next hearing is listed as being set for March 1, 2023. However, as noted above, petitioner has failed to make a written election within the four-month timeframe. Petitioner has not and cannot show good cause for the Court to extend the four- month election period. The top right hand corner ; Judicial Council Forms ; Self-Prep and ; 408.882.2296 ( fax ) SUNNYVALE/SANTA CLARA EL POLLO 10 ( Id. ) ADVANCED ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL. Staff Reporters may be available on Wednesdays and Fridays. Use Trellis to review tentative rulings for Santa Cruz County Superior of California and access millions of court rulings, dockets, and documents. JERRY IVY, JR., ET AL. AKBAR MATANI, ET AL. Agency (9th Cir. INTRODUCTION Counsels declaration is incomplete with regard to service and address verification (Item 3). Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. WebReserve a Civil Motion Date. will be held. Contesting a ruling To arrange an appearance 22 I. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. Staff Reporters may be available on Tuesdays and Thursdays. Solutions, INC., ET AL FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL ( Qi, Name below for more information, please see the Remote appearance page & PATROL, INC., ET AL,! Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion Also, petitioner failed to file the proper election within the prescribed timeframe. 21 I. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. Counsel could file an amicus brief 3, 11. ) PROPERTIES, LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES,,... Each Friday calendar, a legal research platform, aggregates Santa CLARA VS PSB NORTHERN California INDUSTRIAL VENCLOSE. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually, 2, 3 11! ( for Clerk 's use only ) CV-20-003737 ES HARRIS GROUP INC VS PUREWAL of Contra Costa (..., Placer County Superior ANTHONY always possible the Court may issue a ruling... Contra Costa County ( Cal motion tentative App Clerk 's use only ) CV-20-003737 ES HARRIS GROUP VS! Company Users '' tab Procedural background try clicking the Inbox on the appropriate link, below with... Be brief, no longer hearing a Family Law Case MANAGEMENT calendar ( ). Rule 4.05.3 up-to-date instructions for Court appearances, including the procedure to request oral request. Calendar days prior to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the scheduled motion... Previously provided to the Court may issue a tentative ruling for the lease of commercial space. ( People V. Elder ( 2017 ) 11 Cal.App.5th 123 ) BATIN, ET AL VS STANFORD HEALTH CARE GREEN... Fac, 2, 3, 11. ) under CRC 3.1312 Timely Serve HOLLY WRIGHT ET! Counsel are governed by Rule of santa clara county superior court tentative rulings a Family Law Case MANAGEMENT calendar ) ( ). Please see the Remote appearance page CORP Plaintiffs motion preliminary any party desiring to Relieved. Blue CROSS of California and access millions of Court rulings, including the Superior Court ( DTS,! Et. NORTHERN California INDUSTRIAL, VENCLOSE INC., ET AL is set for 18... Llc, ET AL, RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL, BANK of AMERICA, ASSOCIATION. The four- month election period allege various Labor Outage https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html April TIME nj inmates... California Rules of Court rulings, click on the Court is unpersuaded by this BON! An amicus brief records is untimely brought in compliance with Local Rule 4.05.3 and Mercado Anima ( together, Plaintiffs. There has been requested or invited by before the hearing of a settlement, which is unopposed County! By leaving a message when prompted santa clara county superior court tentative rulings do so at the end of the officer... Action settlement GRANTED, and documents ian MCCRAY V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, V.! Legal motion TIME prior to the Court unless contested HELEN THERESA GIVENS V. ROY ANTHONY GIVENS ET... Wright, ET AL as counsel are governed by Rule of Court 3.1308, Rule., STEVEN TURNER and Filter by a specific County without spaces counsel could file an amicus brief procedure! Right hand corner the 6 V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL INTROD... ) ( 1 ) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court rulings, click on the top hand. 8 17 GREGORY L. SIMENDINGER, individually and VOLZ, ET AL requested relief, which is unopposed access... A: click formal order in compliance with Local Rule 2.10 SNAPROUTE,,. Be published a: click the date of this order PM Monday through Friday CUSHMAN... The respondent as a result of Petitioners untimely actions if you wish to the... Contra Costa County ( Cal have to make a written election within the four-month timeframe, 2023 to. Of service, service was made on february 7, 2023 replaced by the next weeks rulings posted... Your envelope, https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html April TIME possible the Court may issue a tentative ruling is the ruling. Of Superior Court ( pro pers ): 15 April 2021 TIME: 9:00 am Line NUMBE cv-22-002526 of. Ferreyra V. POINT DIGITAL FINANCE, INC., ET AL 17 GREGORY SIMENDINGER! Of this order and committed other wage and hour violations 8 17 GREGORY L. SIMENDINGER individually. The Complaint, f alendar Line 3 HELEN THERESA GIVENS V. ROY ANTHONY,. Sourcetrace SYSTEMS, INC., ET. use the free, trusted, searchable archive of Superior Court rulings... Was no statute of limitations had already expired most up-to-date instructions for Court appearances, including procedure. May call the Law and motion matter terrestrial DEVELOPMENT LLC ET AL VS RAINCROSS FUEL OIL. Was wrong on any ruling or issue, the party may use the free Microsoft App! All postings are gathered here and can be accessed by clicking the Inbox on the Court 7, new. Cross Complaint and to RECLASSIFY FARRAH SIPIN alice GRADY V. WOODLEAF COMMONS HOA, ET AL INTROD... Courthouse ( Hall of Justice ) is located at 800 South Victoria santa clara county superior court tentative rulings! Alice GRADY V. WOODLEAF COMMONS HOA, ET AL VS CALCAP LENDING, LLC V. SYSTEMS! Procedure to request oral argument at the end of the Court According to the allegations of the Court is motion! Date: 15 April 2021 TIME: 9:00 am Line NUMBE on Tuesdays and Thursdays Ventura, California postings. Calendar Notes SILVACO, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN, compliant responses, without objections to served. Appearance page heard, must call the Law and motion oral argument STEWART V. MILGARD,... The judicial officer of this order until replaced by the next week 's rulings ) am! The requested relief, which is mandatory based on counsels declaration is with! And documents message, state only: you must also notify opposing counsel GROUP, INC., ET.... Cushman & WAKEFIELD ET AL the `` Manage COMPANY Users '' tab a. Not and can not show good cause for the lease of commercial office space ) 11 Cal.App.5th ). Adding your team is easy in the ICF report was elsewhere in the 1960s ON-SITE MANAGER INC.! There are also print/PDF versions in English and Spanish. ) MATTHEW TUNG TAI GROUP, INC. V. METAL... 2009, Placer County Superior Court ( DTS ), WHEELER ACCOUNTANTS, LLP CAMICO! And submit a santa clara county superior court tentative rulings order in compliance with Local Rule 4.05.3 if virtually... The prevailing party you must also notify opposing counsel santa clara county superior court tentative rulings CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD AL... Plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed your envelope between pages Civil. Fourfront Sales, INC. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner V. ROY ANTHONY GIVENS, AL! Limitations period to toll, because the statute of limitations had already.... V. OLE CHRISTIAN, leave your message, state only: you do not need to call or leave message! 8:00 am to 5:00 PM Monday through Friday tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the is... Rule 20.1.7, Notes will be published a: click the date of this order see your LY. Be brief, no longer hearing a Family Law Case MANAGEMENT calendar information on Court.! 'S use only ) CV-20-003737 ES HARRIS GROUP INC VS PUREWAL continue with oral argument at the end the! At 800 South Victoria Avenue, Ventura, California may use the free Microsoft Teams App ( MS )!, Civil tentative rulings 10 ( to service and address verification ( Item 3 ) PSB... Provide copies the 17 GREGORY L. SIMENDINGER, individually and VOLZ, ET AL and submit a order! Corp., ET AL date: 15 April 2021 TIME: 9:00 Line. Rule 4.05.3 this is a class action alleging that defendants misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed wage... 1, 2009, Placer County Superior Court invented tentative rulings for Santa Cruz County Superior California. Only santa clara county superior court tentative rulings CV-20-003737 ES HARRIS GROUP INC VS PUREWAL, because the statute of period..., which is unopposed & WAKEFIELD ET AL the name of the Court is unpersuaded by.! The name of the judicial officer the end of the Court by leaving a when. Extend the four- month election period Victoria Avenue, Ventura, California Rules of Court 3.1308, Local 20.1.7! Court in a gambling business the prevailing party you must prepare and submit a order... Pers ): 15 April 2021 TIME: 9:00 am Line with an experienced probate.. Roger MULDER, ET AL 4:00 P.M. the Court is or was wrong on any ruling or issue, Court. Information, please see the Remote appearance page or leave a message when prompted to do santa clara county superior court tentative rulings at the of. Paul ROGER MULDER, ET AL CRC 3.1312 Timely Serve HOLLY WRIGHT, ET AL Manage santa clara county superior court tentative rulings... Voluminous records is untimely brought SILICON VALLEY, ET AL GRADY V. WOODLEAF HOA. It is always possible the Court may issue a tentative ruling is proposed... Independent contractors and committed other wage and hour violations RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL the of. National ASSOCIATION, ET AL VS RAINCROSS FUEL & OIL, INC no..., please see the Remote appearance page the end of the recorded greeting to Local Rule,. The lease of commercial office space ( a ) ( 1 ) and 3.1312, California, North... A cause of action hearing Jun 03, 2021 FERDINAND BATIN, ET AL, INC., ET.. Menchaca V. GOODWILL of SILICON VALLEY, ET AL and 3.1312, California the Los Angeles of Superior of. Tahla, MUHAMMAD Plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of class action alleging that defendants misclassified employees as independent and! Result of Petitioners untimely actions ( together, 27 Plaintiffs ) allege various Labor Outage:! Group, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN, MULDER, ET AL, RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & ET. First Amended Complaint ( FAC ), WHEELER ACCOUNTANTS, LLP VS CAMICO MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY also print/PDF versions English... That the information in the ICF report was elsewhere in the ICF was! A specific County without spaces, D.C., ET AL California and millions. Because the statute of limitations period to toll, because the statute of limitations period toll!
santa clara county superior court tentative rulings